安全感英语作文
篇一：insecurity中国人的无安全感意识 八百字英文作文
Insecurity
When SARS flooded to China eight years ago, each of Chinese people was as jittery as the prisoner in the concentration camp. In their eyes, air, water, and food were all polluted by SARS. They were eager to find out some of efficient medicine to protect themselves. As a result, as soon as a rumor came that garlic could prevent SARS from invading their immune system, garlic sold out at an amazing speed.
Today after eight years, a rumor still has a great effect on Chinese people’s mind. Some days ago, a magnitude 9 earthquake in Fudao, Japan killed more than 10 thousand people, and created a tsunami. More seriously, a nuclear power station directly affected exploded, which obviously led to nuclear slipping. Japanese people were all calm while Chinese people living along the coast felt anxious about being radiated. Some salt dealers and businessmen leaped at the opportunity to assiduously propagate that salt efficiently resists radiation. Following a calculated publicity buildup, salt became hot sale in the market, as if a life-saver.
When ordinary daily use in the life, such as garlic and salt should cause quite a stir, I begin to think that what happened to Chinese people, what made them so insecure from the bottom of their hearts.
Last year, the national economy maintained good momentum and a new high was scored in economics aggregates. With the rapid
development of domestic and international business, china has even surpassed Japan, and rank the second in the world, following the US. It is obviously seen that China is growing more and more powerful in every aspect, let alone daily use supplement. As a matter of fact, the richer china is, the less secure they feel. Why are they so? As far as I am concerned, there are two reasons for it.
On the one hand, before reform and opening-up in 1978, China has always been in a turbulent period, being confronted with many difficulties, such as economic depression, instable political situation. As a result, the infrastructure and production were backward so that food and daily use were in the short for a long time. Under this circumstance, Chinese people were always living under an extremely low standard of living. What they did every day was just to exchange corresponding food cards or pork cards or other cards. During the era of reform and opening-up, politics, economy and culture all developed steadily and rapidly, many Chinese families took the chance to go into business and lived a well-off life eventually. Nothing is so simple as earning a good living. Compared to other nations, Chinese people value their happiness more because it is not that easy for them to pursue it. Their life, once threatened, they will do whatever they can do to protect it. It is insecurity flowing in their blood that makes them crazily scramble for the salt.
On the other hand, more importantly, one feels insecure mostly
because of the environment he lives in being unsafe. So are Chinese people living in China. Despite that China occupies an important position in the world stage of economy, politics and culture, its inner administrative system is still perfect. Especially the management system of food and drug is closely related to daily life and national health. This trend is likely to develop more seriously. For example, the events of disqualify pharmaceutical, poisonous milk and hogwash oil have recently been disclosed by the media one followed another, involving many major fields in daily life. What Chinese people eat, wear and use every day are not taken safe for granted any more. Living in China needs great courage to get out of various traps. There is no doubt that no one will feel secure with basic safety of life takes risk. The relationship between the public and the government tends to be more intense in the present posture of any efficient measure being not taken. To scramble for salt reflects what Chinese people would rather believe in what they are able to do than trust their great motherland which can protect them. Insecurity not only reflects human’s attributes but also explains a philosophical theory that external cause has a greater influence than expected. For Chinese people, first of all, to be strong within heart is more than earning much money. Security comes from powerful spirits, so having a belief is a good choice. Besides, Chinese management system reform is a matter of great urgency. Only when country is strong can people be stronge(转 载于:wWw.zW2.cn 爱作文 网)r!
Kelsi: the topic is quite hot and thoughtful. Using the examples of SARS as the leading-in, then you transfer the focus on the issue of rushing for salt naturally. And later you give us your idea of the causes of the phenomenon. But you should pay more attention to your diction. It is a little chinglish.
Lisa: it is very good and necessary for us to keep up with the current new as English majors. Depend on the reality and have our own thinking is a very good way to develop our independent thinking. Try to keep it.
Eshell: your essay is quite profound. I like your natural introduction a lot. It seems that people do have a strong sense of insecurity. Your examples well verify this fact. At last you give out your own profound opinion. It is very nice.
篇二：英语作文
篇三：英语作文
从“重庆打黑”案引发的思考
去年6月以来，重庆市共抓获涉黑涉恶人员3348人，立案查办涉黑团伙案件63个、涉恶团伙案件235个，摧毁了14个重大黑社会性质组织的团伙，同时打掉了一批黑恶势力的“保护伞”。 打黑期间，龚刚模案、李庄案、黎强案疑点重重引发轩然大波。今年4月14日，在重庆打黑中落马的最高级别官员，原重庆司法局局长文强被一审法院判处死刑。这被认为是重庆扫黑接近尾声的一个重要信号。虽然各界对于重庆打黑，议论颇多，但在本地，深得重庆市民认同却是不争事实。大多市民皆表示，较打黑之前，安全感大大提升。
然而，事件平息之后，我们不禁要思考，文强等国家领导干部为何会贪赃枉法，腐败至此？社会黑势力何以如此猖獗，未能及时得到法律制裁？李庄作为律师因涉嫌伪造证据、妨害作证罪被判刑又带给我们那些思考？
在办案中的确出现了一些情况：第一，办理本案的律师，不得会见被告人。被告人不管犯了什么罪，不管严重到什么程度，他都有委托律师的权利，律师有为他提供法律帮助的权利，有会见权，而在本案中一律不得会见。第二，在审判阶段，所有律师都看不到案卷。第三，所有的案子都是快起诉，快审理。律师看不到案卷，会见不到被告人，如何发挥辩护权？
而且在开庭时邀请一些人大代表、政协委员来听案件，把起诉书宣读完就可以走了，庭审结束以后再通知代表、委员座谈。这就意识
形态化了，政治气氛太浓。现在是21世纪了，不是1983年的严打，更不是完全没有法制的五六十年代。我们不但要求实体公正，而且程序公正也是必要的。
当某种社会现象是个别人的行为所致时，我们可以认为是道德、教育问题；当某种社会现象源于众多人的行为时，我们则应该从制度上找原因。
这次打黑暴露出来的——那些贪官污吏权钱交换，鱼肉民众，几乎不受任何法律限制的权力，以及在地方无法无天的所作所为，这是我们缺乏“法治”的最大弊端。真正的“法治”一定是需要民主制度来保障的，可以这样说，没有民主自由的政治制度，现代意义上的“法治”根本就不存在。“法治”的主要精神就包括司法独立、依法办事、法律面前人人平等等原则。大家可以设想一下，在没有制度支援和保障的情况下，大谈“法治”，能够走多远？当从“制度”层面来审视重庆打黑的时候，则发现，整个件事已经不再是一个法律和“法治”的问题，而是一个制度的问题，一个足足可以决定我们是否能够拥有真正法治的更大的问题。法律事件政治化，还是政治问题法律化？
重庆打黑事件到底是一个法律事件，还是一个政治问题？我想这个问题从一开始，就不是泾渭分明，更不是一目了然的。我们看到：打黑除恶原本是纯粹的法律事件，可这法律事件却偏偏并不那么单纯——重庆打黑实际是有人要用“法律事件”来解决政治问题、达到政治目的，于是，神圣的“法律”也就自然变成为政治服务的手段和工具了。我们都应该清楚，不管重庆打黑是否是一个法律事件，还是有人想政
治化，其实际暴露出的问题绝不仅仅是法律甚至“法治”可以解决的问题，而是一个大至政治制度和民主才能给出答案的问题。然而，如果是在一个缺乏“法治”的国家，一个有法制却没有法治，有《宪法》却没有宪政的国家里，你又如何可以把政治事件法律化？
“重庆打黑”已经结束，然而给我们的思考却是深远的。很多地方很多部门都依然存在着严重的腐败，在加强党自身执政能力建设的同时，更要注重整个国家法治的建设。